IBAMA said no!

Brazil’s environment agency stops Petrobras from drilling in the Foz do Amazonas basin.

The Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (“IBAMA”) is the governmental agency entrusted with the preservation of Brazil’s diverse ecosystems. Under the purview of the globally revered environmentalist Marina Silva, Minister of the Environment and Climate Change of Brazil, IBAMA attempts to strike a balance between environmental protection and the economic contribution from country’s extractive industry. Most recently, that balance has shifted towards environmental protection as the regulator clamps down on exploration in or near the Amazon. 

On 17 May 2023 IBAMA, rejected Petrobras’ request to drill a well on the Foz do Amazonas basin at the mouth of the Amazon River, 170 kilometres off the coast of Amapá. IBAMA’s technical experts ruled against the proposal, arguing of potential environmental harms and threats to the conservation of indigenous lands in the region. 

The director of a major Brazilian NGO was delighted by the ruling, “We are very happy with IBAMA’s decision. But let me emphasise, this is not only a success from an environmental point of view but also a success of the rule of law in Brazil. Bear in mind that Petrobras, with all its money and the power and the support of the government, has a tradition of imposing its projects and twisting the arm on regulatory bodies when needed. This time, IBAMA was clear about the environmental perils that this project could cause, and the ministry of energy stood firm with the ruling which was based on a technical assessment.” 

“…this is not only a success from an environmental point of view but also a success of the rule of law in Brazil.”

The director of a major Brazilian NGO

Petrobras insists its proposal adheres to all technical requirements and will launch an appeal but Marina Silva remains resolute in her opposition of the proposal, even in the face of significant opposition from government allies in Congress. 

This conflict leaves Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in an uncomfortable position. Traditionally perceived as a president who honours past contracts and favours Petrobras’s role in the development of the oil industry, he is now stuck in the middle of congressional fight insisting that 28 million people living in the Amazon have the right to explore their own natural resources. For their part, the left-wing led government of Amapá supports the project, seeing it as the goose that lays the golden eggs for its economic future. Randolfe Rodrigues, chief whip of the government in Congress, supports Lula’s view and has said that the government will meet with all public bodies to address IBAMA’s environmental concerns and, eventually, secure Petrobras’s project off the coast of Amapá. 

The NGO director commented, “IBAMA’s ruling is tied to Lula’s political capital. He championed the environment in his electoral campaign to win votes. He has clashed with Marina Silva in the past so her appointment to his cabinet was seen as a firm commitment to his environmental pledges. The difficulty for Lula is that his position in Congress is weak and to pass his key policies he will need to make some sacrifices and the environment may be one of those. Unfortunately, Lula’s environmental agenda is more a consequence of his political calculations and not of his convictions. He knows that some environmentally damaging infrastructure projects such the exploitation of potassium mines in the Amazon, the incentives to purchase cars for the poor or the Ferrogrão railway (grain rail) will grant him votes in these regions. Whether all this will happen and at what political cost, it is difficult to tell at this point.”  

“Unfortunately, Lula’s environmental agenda is more a consequence of his political calculations and not of his convictions.”

The director of a major Brazilian NGO

While environmental NGOs celebrate this outcome and many investors watch closely, Petrobras recently announced that “it will exercise its right to file a Request for Reconsideration with the Presidency of IBAMA” to reconsider the decision to deny the environmental license. For Petrobas it’s not over until it’s over!   

Important Notice
While the information in this article has been prepared in good faith, no representation, warranty, assurance or undertaking (express or implied) is or will be made, and no responsibility or liability is or will be accepted by Deheza Limited or by its officers, employees or agents in relation to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of this article, or of any other information (whether written or oral), notice or document supplied or otherwise made available in connection with this article. All and any such responsibility and liability is expressly disclaimed.
This article has been delivered to interested parties for information only. Deheza Limited gives no undertaking to provide the recipient with access to any additional information or to update this article or any additional information, or to correct any inaccuracies in it which may become apparent.

Most recent in Energy

Power Play

Mexico’s renewable energy race in the presidential arena.

Methanol Marvel

Sinaloa's sustainable industrial revolution in Mexico.

Green horizons

Chile's ENAP and global partners forge the path to hydrogen future. 

Suriname’s oil dream

Total's investment sparks economic transformation.

The green Chile

Chile’s hot renewable energy aspirations...

Batteries not included

With a new operating model, Bolivia dumps the Germans in favour of the Chinese to exploit its lithium reserves.

Petro against petroleum

Petro plans to accelerate Colombia’s energy transition with ban on new exploration contracts.

Renewable leadership

Latin America is aiming for 70% renewable energy but how is it progressing?

Water harvesting

Saint Kitts and Nevis look for rainwater harvesting sites to improve access to water.

Tricky transition

With an economy reliant on fossil fuels, Trinidad and Tobago’s energy transition isn’t easy.